Feedburner

Add to Google

Powered by Blogger

Monday, October 02, 2006

I'm a "Consensus Builder"

Buzzwords. Platitudes. Cliches. Maybe that's all I have to use during this campaign. I get really annoyed with all of it, but I have to admit that it's very difficult to describe yourself, your abilities or the issues without using them.

"Consensus Builder." That's my favorite expression to loathe. I think anyone that uses that tired old phrase should have to use finger quotes when they say it. Same thing with "people person", "goal oriented" or "synergy".

Maybe I'm being too detailed when I discuss issues with voters. Saturday night I was cornered by someone who had immediately informed me that he was supporting one of my opponents. "Go ahead and tell me what you will do if you're elected" he said. I figured I was wasting my time but I wasn't going to be rude and dismiss him because of his professed allegiance to a competitor. I talked about economic development incentives, the budget revenue structure and what I could change and what I couldn't. He quizzed me on transit. Codes enforcement. I detailed the EPA and the Clean Water Act and what our financial options are for funding our billion dollar sewer problem. He quizzed me more on financial issues, my educational background. He quizzed me on a lot of things. His friend whom I had met earlier stood off the side the whole time needling him. "See?" "I told ya!" "I told ya!" he kept prodding. Finally he said with a troubled look on his face, "when I asked your opponent that question, all he/she said was "I'm going to do the right thing."" I worked pretty hard for it but I think I earned his vote.

Should I just be paraphrasing titles from Spike Lee movies? Should I just go around telling people "I'll fight for you" or "I'll get things done"? I hope not. I like to think the voters are smarter than that.

Comments on "I'm a "Consensus Builder""

 

Millie said ... (2:04 PM) : 

That's funny. Now every time I hear someone say "consensus builder" I'll picture Dr. Evil saying "laser beam"

 

Anonymous said ... (6:56 PM) : 

Unfortunately a lot of people aren't smarter than that and vote based on name recognition. You may be winning people over one at a time but without a lot of money and a lot of direct mail, you're sunk.

 

Dan said ... (9:29 PM) : 

Anonymous - Mark is sunk like Jolie Justus was sunk. He's going to win because he's working harder and smarter than his opponents. Direct mail is fine, but wasteful. Getting out and talking to the people who have a history of showing up at the polls is what will work.

 

Anonymous said ... (10:06 PM) : 

Mel Soloman is going to give me "pedestrian synergy"(white people talk). What does that even mean.

Hey Mel, if you want mexicans in the 4th district to vote for you, you better lighten up on the vocabulary. Its not that mexicans aren't smart we just don't like "smarty pants".

 

Mark said ... (9:40 AM) : 

Dan, thanks for the defense. anonymous is either concerned about my campaign or works for one of the direct mail companies here in town! I didn't take it as a slight. Some of my closest friends are concerned that I'm not running this campaign "the usual way." I have to admit there are some days when I think about how a couple of my opponents are going to have over $100,000 each and it seems a bit scary. That is an obscene amount of money.

Lasaro, I've been known to use a lot of fifty cent words myself. I even used "platitude" in this post. Who talks like that? Geeks like me I guess! Interesting that you are Mexican. I thought Abalos was an old Irish name. ;-)

Thanks for reading.

 

post a comment