Feedburner

Add to Google

Powered by Blogger

Monday, January 29, 2007

Romanelli West Forum

Yesterday was the Romanelli West Neighborhood forum in the auditorium of Southwest High School. The mayoral candidates were first and went way over time which we were all anticipating anyway. By the time we humble council candidates took the stage over half the crowd and most of the media people had left out of boredom or exhaustion.

I didn't feel like it was one of my best performances. I was a little off my game but only my wife seemed to notice. The in-district candidates fielded questions on conflicts of interests, TIF, and education. That's all there was time for because we all had to be out of the building by 6PM. The at-large candidates got the smoking ban and economic development as it relates to small business.

It was interesting for me to see how some candidates have gotten better at public speaking, and others have grown worse. The audience was given scorecards to rate each candidate on a scale of 1 to 5 on different attributes. I stupidly did not get one to fill out so I didn't get a chance to give myself all 5's! Some people seemed confused by the cards so I'm not sure how valid the data will be when it comes out. I will, of course change my opinion if I have the highest scores once they are posted!

Update: The first review is in and well... Kinda good, kinda bad. A commenter over at KC Buzz Blog had this to say about my performance yesterday:

Mark Forsythe - Very bright. Very knowledgeable. Tends to ramble and couldn't get everything he wanted to say out in the time limit. Obviously loves to be in front of a crowd.

Guilty as charged. I do love to be in front of a crowd. Youngest child syndrome. "Tends to ramble?" Ouch! And that's saying something considering we were only given a couple of minutes to respond to a question. Oh well. It could have been worse I guess. I was rambling.

Comments on "Romanelli West Forum"

 

Anonymous Craig said ... (11:21 AM) : 

I wrote some questions, but had to leave before the 4th district forum really got underway.

1. Are the workings of city government adequately transparent? If not, what can be done to improve it?

2. Should city employees be allowed to go to work for firms and corporations which they did business with during their time as a city employee?

I wonder if these questions were ever asked, or did they do like they did in the mayoral forum and basically say "Please attack the person to your right"?

 

Anonymous Michelled said ... (11:26 AM) : 

This doesn't have anything to do with the post but I love it. Comment from KC Buzz Blog - managed by KC Star.

"The Star is obviously incapable of covering anything so I guess we'll have to rely on commenters or maybe a blogger was there. Those of us unable to attend can only hope."

 

Blogger Mark said ... (2:52 PM) : 

Craig,

To question 1? No. But I don't have the time to go into theories. Read my position paper on boards and commissions.

Question 2? You can't control what someone does with their life. I understand your concerns about undue influence but we live in a free-market society and letting workers move from job to job is one of those freedoms I support.

 

Anonymous DaveKCMO said ... (8:07 PM) : 

i plead the "star defense"... i was really tired of sitting in those tiny wooden auditorium seats and didn't stay for the council portion. i hope to see you battle it out some day. is there another 4th district forum, or did i totally blow it?

 

post a comment