Reverse 911
During my research I stumbled on the concept of Reverse 911. Simply put, it's a system that lets the authorities call you in the event of an emergency. A home’s phone will ring just as it would for any other call except there would be a recorded message giving information on the emergency and steps you should take. That message could be to evacuate, be on the lookout for a missing child, or even to lock your windows and doors to guard against a dangerous fugitive. A second "all clear" call would come when the emergency was over. As I watched yesterday's events unfold in real time on kcrag.com, I remembered back to reading about the Reverse 911 system and how useful it might have been. People were posting their concerns on the board. Should they evacuate? Stay home? Run screaming through the streets that the end of time had arrived? (OK I threw that last one in for effect) Rather than rely on media, and emails, and manual phone calls, the following scenario could have taken place. The situation commander at the scene calls the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and an emergency plan is set in motion. So far, that's exactly how things happened yesterday. If we had a Reverse 911 system, the EOC could also have prepared a quick recorded message, drew a radius over a map on a computer screen and automated phone calls would have begun racing out to every phone number in that radius. It's not a perfect system. Cell phones for one are not tied to a geographic location. Of course that could be solved by voluntary subscriptions through the City's website. I for one wouldn't mind my cell phone ringing if I needed to evacuate or be on the lookout for a lost child. Then of course there's the issue of cost. (Isn't there always?). Systems can cost upwards of $90,000. Maintenance would probably be $15-20K/yr too. Not cheap, but not a bank breaker either. Every couple of years a municipality manages to grab a federal homeland security grant for one of these systems so there's always that option. Maybe a good first project for that full-time grant-writer I've been advocating for? I'm not saying I absolutely want to deploy a Reverse 911 system for Kansas City, but if it's feasible, and it saves lives, wouldn't it at least be worth investigating? |













Comments on "Reverse 911"
-
Chris said ... (4:12 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (4:32 PM) :
-
Chris said ... (4:49 PM) :
-
Chris said ... (4:50 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (3:16 PM) :
-
Hank Reardon said ... (11:56 AM) :
post a commentNot cheap, but not a bank breaker either. Every couple of years a municipality manages to grab a federal homeland security grant for one of these systems so there's always that option. Maybe a good first project for that full-time grant-writer I've been advocating for?
You can't say you won't take PAC money or lobbyist money and then say you'll grab a federal grant. Same thing Mark...
Chris,
I'm failing to make the connection between my campaign not taking PAC money and the City of Kansas City getting a federal grant for a phone system. Could you connect the dots for me?
The City got Federal grant money for mast arm traffic lights a couple of years ago. Does that mean I took PAC money?
Am I missing something?
I'm guessing the idea behind not taking PAC money is so you won't appear beholden to anybody else.
Taking federal money simply makes you beholden to another entity- the federal government.
Think about the federal government holding out the carrot of highway funding so states would lower the drinking age.
What am I really asking is what is your principle behind not taking PAC money and how does it relate to accepting money from other, non Kansas City related sources?
Chris,
My principle behind not taking PAC money is so I can remain uninfluenced by powerful groups. I just want to represent my constituents, not my contributors.
Chris,
What are you smoking or whose campaign are you working for? Those are some of the most outlandish arguments I've ever seen!
Federal Grants = PAC Money?
Nice try but if that's all you can attack Mr. Forsythe with he has no worries.