MO Clean Energy Initiative makes the ballot
| The Clean Energy Initiative made it on the ballot! Now get out November 7th and vote for it! FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Monday, September 08, 2008 St. Louis, MO — - Missourians for Cleaner Cheaper Energy (MCCE) announced today that the Missouri Clean Energy Initiative will appear on the November 4, 2008 ballot. The Cole County Circuit Court found that the initiative has the necessary number of signatures to be certified for the ballot in November. More than 400 Missouri volunteers statewide circulated petition pages for the initiative, which would require investor-owned utilities to generate or purchase 15% of their electricity from clean energy sources, such as wind and solar power, landfill gas, biomass, and small hydroelectric projects. Approximately 163,000 signatures were turned in from six US Congressional districts. “The Clean Energy Initiative will reduce the use of fossil fuel for electricity and encourage growth in Missouri’s renewable energy industries. The potential growth in these industries could lead to significant job creation and gains in income for Missourians,” said Dr. David Laslo of UM-St. Louis Public Policy Research Center. “The Clean Energy Initiative would diversify Missouri’s electricity supply by adding a significant amount of renewable energy, and potentially save Missourians $331 million over twenty years," said Martin Cohen, former Illinois Citizens Utility Board Executive Director. The Clean Energy Initiative is endorsed by a broad based coalition of industry, labor, faith, and environmental groups such as Kansas City Power & Light, United Steelworkers, Restoring Eden – Christians for Environmental Stewardship, and Republicans for Environmental Protection. Twenty-six other states have enacted similar renewable electricity standards to increase production of clean energy and promote energy independence. “Missourians support this policy because it cleans our air, creates jobs, invigorates the economy, and makes Missouri more energy independent,” said Erin Noble, Energy Policy Coordinator for the Missouri Coalition for the Environment. “In fact, by 2022, the Clean Energy Initiative will have the same effect as removing 2 million cars from the road. This initiative moves us towards a cleaner and healthier future for Missouri families.” |













Comments on "MO Clean Energy Initiative makes the ballot"
-
idan said ... (11:46 PM) :
-
Mark said ... (9:44 AM) :
post a commentSince when is hydroelectric considered "green"? What is "small hydroelectic"? I love dams; I think they are amazing specimens of engineering and construction but they have wreaked havoc on our environment. The Colorado river is in sad shape. The upper Missouri is unrecognizeable. Is this a 1940's proposal???... okay I found the proposed language which defines "small" as less than 10Megawatts. This law will encourage many small dams to be built rather than a few large dams (which realistically can't be built today anyway b/c of enviro restrictions) thus increasing the amount of environmental damage. This seems extremely misguided and dangerous. I am shocked it is in the proposal.
Before anybody votes for this they should understand the cost. There is no free lunch in power. To think you can just create "clean" power with no significant cost increase is naive. And the people most affected by this are the working poor. Look at how many people down in New Orleans couldn't even afford to buy gas to evacuate themselves from Hurricane Gustav. They were dependent on the government to move them out by rail, bus, etc. Those are the same people that can't afford to have sky rocketing energy bills... or sewer bills. And Kansas City has plenty of citizens just like those in New Orleans... okay I see something about a 1% rate increase in the language. Is this even realistic? Seriously, "clean" will cost you some green. Just because you wave a magic green wand doesn't mean all will be well and good.
For some reason nuclear is excluded as a renewable resource. Why?
Is solar energy even realistic? Could Missouri EVER produce 2% of its energy effectively?
The proposers of this intiative MUST answer the cost question and then propose solutions. It is not good enough to simply throw it on the ballot and turn a blind eye to the real results.
The final place this proposal missed the mark is there is nothing that encourages utilities to encourage customers to reduce energy consumption. I see no credit given for reducing consumption. In fact, people will likely use more energy if they think it is "clean" and thus doing less harm.
This proposal falls short in many, many areas and I have only spent 15 minutes thinking about it.
KCP&L is an "environmental group"???? Why you say this?
You can put green lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig.
"KCP&L is an "environmental group"???? Why you say this?"
idan,
I didn't say this. I was only posting the official press release.