Conflicts of Interest
The other night I had an interesting discussion about conflicts of interest with one of my campaign contributors. He's a fun guy to debate with because he has this way of poking holes in your logic without being a jerk about it. I like having those kinds of friends. It keeps me sharp and focused.The topic came up about the City Council's outrageous campaign finance ordinance recently passed. In a rare reversal I begrudgingly commended Councilwoman Nace on recusing herself from the vote because it directly affected her campaign. Of course any campaign finance measure would be a conflict, but in this case I'm guessing Ms. Nace found the conflict to be the ridiculous increases of the limits, not the limits themselves. I am still frustrated though that she couldn't get at least one other councilperson to stand with her, but that's another topic. My friend mentioned that he had contributed to my campaign because he hopes I will vote favorably on issues important to him. Namely pedestrian and bicycle causes. He wanted to know why, under my same logic, that I wouldn't consider any ped & bike issue a conflict of interest because I had knowingly accepted money from a ped & bike enthusiast. Good point. He stopped me in my tracks for a moment. I hemmed and hawwed. I started down the path that my average contribution amounts are $25 and that hardly qualifies as being influential. We both agreed that was a stupid argument. Money is money and $25 is actually a pretty good sized amount for this humble little campaign. Finally I found my footing and wriggled out of his trap. It's not a conflict of interest if you've been on record as having long been a supporter of such a cause. For example, I wrote an As I See It piece in the Kansas City Star back in 2005 that clearly shows I'm an advocate for pedestrian rights. It's well known I oppose BSL (Breed Specific Legislation) in favor of more general laws that outlaw the behavior, not the breed. I support protecting the domestic partner registry from those who wish to write discrimination into our laws. Accepting contributions from like-minded individuals is not a conflict of interest in my mind. In fact, I find it wholly consistent. Of course if all the sudden, a couple of years from now you find me voting against pedestrian issues, and you see I've accepted significant dollars from a developer looking to shave costs, then we have a problem. If that did happen the bloggers in this town would tear me to shreds and I would deserve it. What I've learned is that there are no absolutes when it comes to financial contributions. But I still think it sends a clear message to the voters when you accept money from certain individuals or organizations. I intend to have a list of contributors of which I can be proud. My hope is I will have a voting record of which my constituents will be proud. I don't think doing both will be a conflict. |





































